Cases 31 - 40 of 111,979
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONG
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT, GEO GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Keaton Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Warfield v. Rankin
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ieasha R Warfield
Defendant:
Shawn L Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waite v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Lisa Waite
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROBERTSON v. GARCIA
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
JEROME D. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Braxton v. Hub Vintage Mall & Antiques LLC The et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jack Braxton
Defendant:
Hub Vintage Mall & Antiques LLC The, Jennifer Ruiz-Vasquez and John Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
